Open Letter of Concern to 'IV. ISHID World Conference 2011', Royal College of Surgeons of England, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, and University College Hospital Education Centre, London 18.09.2011
Royal College of
Surgeons of England, host of 'ISHID 2011', London September 18th 2011
>>>
Infopage "ISHID 2011" Protests
>>> Open Letter as
PDF
Zwischengeschlecht.org
P.O.B. 2122
CH-8031 Zurich
nella_at_zwischengeschlecht.info
IV World Congress of the International
Society for
Hypospadias and DSD
(ISHID)
c/o The Royal College of
Surgeons of England
35-43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields
London WC2A 3PE
The Royal College of Surgeons of
England
35-43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields
London WC2A 3PE
The University College Hospital Education
Centre
250 Euston Road
London NW1 2PG
Great Ormond Street Hospital for
Children
34 Great Ormond Street
London WC1N 3JH
London, September 18th 2011
Open Letter of Concern
Dear Mr Joao Luiz Pippi Salle
Dear Mr Azad Mathur
Dear Speakers, Chairs and Participants of IV ISHID World Conference
Dear Royal College of Surgeons of England
Dear University College Hospital Education Centre
Dear Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children
As survivors of non-consensual childhood surgeries (non-consensual surgery, in
this context referring to surgery for which the person suffering the surgery
did not personally give prior, fully informed and free consent), as well as
persons concerned grateful for having escaped such surgeries, we are very
saddened and concerned about how, as far as we can see, an overwhelming
majority of the speakers and Chairpersons at the ‘IV World Congress on
Hypospadias and Disorders of Sex Development hosted by the International
Society for Hypospadias and DSD (ISHID)’ seems to refuse to listen to their
former patients, and instead continue to advocate and perform medically
unnecessary cosmetic genital surgeries on children no matter what the
consequences for these children. We deeply regret that the Royal College of
Surgeons of England, the Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children and the
University College Hospital Education Centre take part in such a questionable
endeavour, including the infamous ‘live surgeries’.
For 50 years now, the practice of systematic cosmetic genital surgeries on
little children with ‘atypical’ genitals persists. In all these years and
decades, the clinicians responsible weren’t able to produce any evidence for
the alleged benefit to the children concerned, not even adequate follow-ups, or
even just to disclose bare statistics, but insist on continuing to operate on
the basis of mere anecdotal evidence.
For 20 years now, survivors of these surgeries have protested them, describing
them consistently as ‘very harmful’ [1] [2] , ‘traumatizing’ [3], as ‘immensely
destructive of sexual sensation and of the sense of bodily integrity’ [4], and
have compared the surgeries and their effects to female genital mutilation [5]
and child sexual abuse [6]. For 20 years now, the clinicians concerned have
refused to heed, let alone acknowledge these grave concerns, but instead
continue repeating the same old excuses [7], ‘essentially impervious to data’
[8].
Peaceful
protest outside the Royal College of Surgeons of England, host of 'ISHID
2011',
with Open Letters to be delivered to ISHID and RCS, London September 18th
2011
During the last decade, these accusations have been backed again and again
by human rights experts [9] and honest clinicians alike, perhaps most notably
by doctors from Middlesex/UCL [10].
However, as far as we know the vast majority just keeps on turning a blind eye
to these criticisms of the surgeries. A few examples from the roster of ‘ISHID
2011’ include:
Marcela M. Bailez: Maria Marcela Bailez: ‘Intersex Disorders’, in: P. Puri and
M. Höllwarth (eds.), Pediatric Surgery: Diagnosis and Management (2009)
A. T. Hadidi: Ahmed T. Hadidi, A. F. Azmy (Eds.) ‘Hypospadias Surgery. An
illustrated guide’ (2004)
Roberto De Castro: Roberto De Castro, Marco Pelagalli, Riad Farhoud, Vincenzo
Domenichelli, and Silvana Federici: Augmented Koyanagi-Nonomura 1-Stage Repair
for Perineal Hypospadias
Peter Cuckow: BBC 11.12.2001
Olaf Hiort: Arte 8.10.2010
Heino F. L. Meyer-Bahlburg: Intersexualität bei Kindern (Ed. Höhne / Finke)
2008
Pierre Mouriquand: Arte 8.10.2010
Joao Luiz Pippi Salle: UBC Urology Rounds, 12.6.2007
Lutz Wünsch: Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde, Volume 156, Number 3, 2008
Considering this, it comes as no surprise that the ‘IV ISHID World
Conference’ culminates in a day of unethical and inhumane ‘live surgeries’,
‘including refreshments’.
Something we find especially repugnant are the repeated statements, amongst
others, by aforementioned clinicians relishing the ‘surgical challenges’,
and stubbornly continuing with their ‘experiments’ in the hope that ‘in 20
years surgery will be much better’, obviously without any care, pity or
compassion with their unfortunate past, present and future victims.
The same applies to the continuing scorn for, and intolerably paternalistic
approaches towards, adult survivors of such surgeries who speak out about their
suffering and demand an end of non-consensual cosmetic genital surgeries on
children and minors, to the endeavours to marginalise their experiences, to
deride them publicly and to deny their right to voice their experiences and
opinions. Same as the claims of clinicians, actually to be the ones who are
victimized, the alleged victimizers being survivors of their surgical
experiments and human rights advocates.
Peaceful
protest outside the Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, host of
the
infamous 'ISHID 2011 Live Surgeries', with Open Letter to be delivered to
GOSH,
London September 18th 2011
We also note that the ‘IV ISHID Conference’ utterly fails to address the
ethical and legal implications of non-consensual cosmetic genital surgeries on
children, despite the ongoing scholarly and public debate. There are many
distinguished experts in the field of Ethics and ‘DSD’, such as Alice Dreger,
Katrina Karkazis and Ellen Feder, who engage with these ethical issues.
Unfortunately, none of these were invited, and where speakers with a background
in ethics like Sharon E. Sytsma appear in the programme, the framing is not
about the ethics of harmful non-consensual cosmetic treatments, but is
tellingly about replacing one unethical treatment with another. In our opinion,
this demonstrates an obvious lack of willingness to listen to former patients,
let alone to enter into a real debate in general and to answer to any critical
questions in particular.
There are also many reports and statements by Human Rights Advocacy Groups (for
example, Terre des Femmes 2004, San Francisco Human Rights Commission 2005,
CEDAW 2009, Amnesty Switzerland 2010, Amnesty Germany 2010) and publications by
experts in these fields (such as Hanny Lightfoot-Klein 2003/2008, Fana Asefaw
2005, Nancy Ehrenreich/Mark Barr 2005) clearly stating that non-consensual
cosmetic surgeries on children gravely violate human rights, particularly the
right to physical integrity, and who underline the similarities and parallels
between these surgeries and the practice of female genital mutilations. Again,
we feel an obvious lack of willingness by the ‘ISHID 2011’ to acknowledge the
facts, let alone to enter into a real debate in general and to answer any
critical questions in particular.
Frankly, we are sick and tired of being lied to and being fobbed off with the
same old denials, excuses and cheap promises.
We are sure you are aware of the controversy about cosmetic genital surgeries
becoming better known in the general public every month, as well as of of the
leaning of the general public with regards to genital mutilation, unethical
medical experiments and unwanted surgeries.
It is our understanding, that in your capacity as clinicians you have plenty of
patients with real medical needs who depend on your professional help, as well
as the ‘IV ISHID Conference’ partly also addresses real medical issues with
bladder or urethral function.
Therefore, we would like to suggest respectfully that you focus your efforts on
helping those patients, whom we are sure that they are deeply grateful for your
services, but on the other hand abandon unethical, inhumane and illegal
practices like non-consensual cosmetic surgeries on children, for which, as you
are surely well aware, many, many of your former patients loathe and despise
you from the bottom of their hearts, and wish you things, which our sense of
politeness forbids us to repeat in this letter.
And we humbly suggest that you do so while you still can on your own
terms.
Thank you for your consideration.
Kind regards
Daniela Truffer, Zwischengeschlecht.org (corresponding author)
Jim Bruce, USA
Mauro Cabral, Argentina
Ai-Chih Chiu (Hiker Chiu), Founder of Organization Intersex International -
Chinese (OII-Chinese), Taiwan
Ditte Dyreborg, Denmark
Sally Gross, Director of Intersex South Africa
Affiliations given for identification purposes only.
Notes
[1] ISNA: ‘Hypospadias: Parent’s Guide to Surgery’ http://www.isna.org/node/81
[2] Tiger Howard Devore: ‘Endless Calls for „More Research“ as Harmful
Interventions Continue’ (1995), Hermaphrodites with Attitude, Fall/Winter
1995-96, http://www.isna.org/files/hwa/winter1996.pdf
[3] Emi Koyama: ‘Intersex Medical Treatment and Sexual Trauma’
[4] Cheryl Chase: Letters from Readers. 1993, The Sciences, July/August, 3,
http://www.isna.org/articles/chase1995a
[5] ISNA’s Amicus Brief on Intersex Genital Surgery (1998) http://www.isna.org/node/97
[6] Tamara Alexander: ‘The Medical Management of Intersexed Children: An
Analogue for Childhood Sexual Abuse’, http://www.isna.org/articles/analog
[7] Alice Dreger: ‘“Ambiguous Sex”—or Ambivalent Medicine?’, The Hastings
Center Report May/Jun 1998, Volume 28, Issue 3 Pages 24-35, http://www.isna.org/articles/ambivalent_medicine
[8] Cheryl Chase: ‘What is the agenda of the intersex patient advocacy
movement?’ (2002), http://www.isna.org/agenda
[9] e.g. Hanny Lightfoot-Klein: ‘Children’s Genitals Under the Knife: Cultural
Imperatives, Secrecy, and Shame’ (2007), Chapter Nine: Intersex Surgery: For
the Good of Whom?, p 167-176
[10] c.f. Emi Koyama: Catherine Minto & Sarah Creighton Fan Page, http://www.ipdx.org/articles/minto-creighton.html
>>> The Extermination of Hermaphrodites
in the "Developed World"
>>> Open Letter of Concern to 11th EMBL/EMBO, Nov. 6 2010
>>> intersex.shadowreport.org
Peaceful protest outside the
University College Hospital Education Centre,
host of the televised 'ISHID 2011 Live Surgeries' ('refreshments
included'),
with Open Letter to be delivered to UCH, London September 19th 2011
Articles in Other Media:
• Campaign
against corrective surgery on children born with indeterminate
genitalia
•
Hermaphrodite wins damage claim over removal of reproductive organs
• Intersex Shadow
Report: "End forced genital surgery now!"
•
Campaign against forced prenatal steroid "therapy" for
"hermaphrodites"
• Hermaphrodites
speak out in Solidarity with Caster Semenya
English Articles on Zwischengeschlecht.org:
- The Hounding of Caster Semenya and the Extermination of Hermaphrodites in the "Developed World"
- "Hermaphrodites" in sports: IOC and IAAF deny responsibility
- IOC/IAAF/FIFA: Mandatory Gender Tests for Female Athletes, Mandatory Surgery for the Intersexed
- "Justice for Santhi Soundarajan and Caster Semenya!" - Hermaphrodites rally against IOC and IAAF, 19.11.09
- Open Letter to International Olympic Committee (IOC), 19.11.2009
- IOC's (Non-)Answer to the Open Letter by Zwischengeschlecht.org
Published on Wednesday 28 September 2011 by nella








